Go Back   AmityMama.com > Keeping mama > Talk Photography

Talk Photography Take off those lens covers and come on in.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-19-2005, 09:36 AM   #16 (permalink)
juliebelle
taking pictures


iTrader: 32 / 100%
 
juliebelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: athens, georgia
Posts: 27,861
not liking that i need a new lens to zoom.....uggg....might be returning this thing...
__________________
~julie~
mama to savannah, jackson and baby scarlett due in 2009!


STUFF I HAVE FOR SALE
juliebelle is online now   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links (Become a Supporting Member to hide these :)
Old 11-19-2005, 11:26 AM   #17 (permalink)
jo
sitting at the head of the Amity round table


iTrader: 11 / 100%
 
jo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,381
Which lens came in the kit? I went with the nikon in large part because of the great rep for lens quality. I expect that I will use the 70-200 lens most of the time, and it got spectacular reviews. I did most of my research at www.kenrockwell.com

I'm sorry you aren't loving the camera- I hope you get something you are happy with in the end

~jo
__________________
formerly known as sagemama
Sage Emma 10-21-99
Torin Rory 05-05-02
Rhys Maryn 11-15-04
MacEwan Arthur 05-23-2007



www.TheSageMama.com
My Feedback
jo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2005, 03:35 PM   #18 (permalink)
juliebelle
taking pictures


iTrader: 32 / 100%
 
juliebelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: athens, georgia
Posts: 27,861
Quote:
Originally Posted by sagemama
Which lens came in the kit? I went with the nikon in large part because of the great rep for lens quality. I expect that I will use the 70-200 lens most of the time, and it got spectacular reviews. I did most of my research at www.kenrockwell.com

I'm sorry you aren't loving the camera- I hope you get something you are happy with in the end

~jo
18-55mm came with it
juliebelle is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2005, 06:20 PM   #19 (permalink)
juliebelle
taking pictures


iTrader: 32 / 100%
 
juliebelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: athens, georgia
Posts: 27,861
nm

Last edited by juliebelle : 11-20-2005 at 08:58 AM.
juliebelle is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2005, 06:26 PM   #20 (permalink)
juliebelle
taking pictures


iTrader: 32 / 100%
 
juliebelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: athens, georgia
Posts: 27,861
Quote:
Originally Posted by macspeno
I have owned both the Digital Rebel and the Nikon D70. (The original versions of each, not the XT or the D70s.) I was happy with the DRebel but am absolutely in LOVE with the D70. I am comfortable with it in my hand in a way that I never was with the Rebel. If it's at all possible, I recommend going somewhere where you can actually handle the camera and see how it "fits" you. It's weird because they are so similar, but there was such a big difference in the feeling I had using them.

I will post some D70 pics later.
ok..i bought the rebel...but get this...i'm going to buy the d70 tonight

i'm playing with them this weekend and then deciding which one i will keep.
juliebelle is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2005, 07:17 PM   #21 (permalink)
jo
sitting at the head of the Amity round table


iTrader: 11 / 100%
 
jo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,381
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...=207359&is=USA

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/70300g.htm

sorry- its a 70-300

have fun playing- I loved the feel of the d70, but my hands are super tiny and the slight size difference really helped me.

~jo
jo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2005, 07:24 PM   #22 (permalink)
juliebelle
taking pictures


iTrader: 32 / 100%
 
juliebelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: athens, georgia
Posts: 27,861
Quote:
Originally Posted by sagemama
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...=207359&is=USA

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/70300g.htm

sorry- its a 70-300

have fun playing- I loved the feel of the d70, but my hands are super tiny and the slight size difference really helped me.

~jo
thank you very much.
juliebelle is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2005, 07:26 PM   #23 (permalink)
KimberMama
Registered User

iTrader: 1 / 100%
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: In the Land of Golden Warmth, Surrounded by Majestic Mountains, Inspired by Desert and Ocean, Cocooned in Love
Posts: 3,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by juliebelle
not liking that i need a new lens to zoom.....uggg....might be returning this thing...
Julie, I mentioned to DH that you bought this camera and weren't completely happy, and he suggested that you might be much happier with the Canon S2 than a digital SLR. Look at the link and read the first review:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...ics&v =glance

The Rebel XT doesn't come with a quality lens, and a lower end Nikon SLR won't either. You'll think your pictures look okay, but when you blow them up they won't stay sharp.

My friend has a Canon 10D SLR (precursor to the 20D) and she takes great pictures with her zoom. I mentioned this to to DH, because he had pooh-poohed the 10D. When he saw her camera with the zoom lens he pointed out to me that she was using a $1500 zoom lens. It makes a difference.

You have to really think about why you want an SLR. Do you like changing lenses? Do you need a shoe mount for an add-on flash? Do you like carrying a camera bag the size of a small carry-on (camera + flash +lenses)? Will you use a variety of lenses (macro, 50mm, short zoom, long zoom) or do just want a camera that can do it all and do it well?

You might decide that you do need an SLR. But I didn't even know the Canon S2 was an option.

Kimberly
KimberMama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2005, 07:28 PM   #24 (permalink)
juliebelle
taking pictures


iTrader: 32 / 100%
 
juliebelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: athens, georgia
Posts: 27,861
thanks!

Quote:
Originally Posted by KimberMama
Julie, I mentioned to DH that you bought this camera and weren't completely happy, and he suggested that you might be much happier with the Canon S2 than a digital SLR. Look at the link and read the first review:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...ics&v =glance

The Rebel XT doesn't come with a quality lens, and a lower end Nikon SLR won't either. You'll think your pictures look okay, but when you blow them up they won't stay sharp.

My friend has a Canon 10D SLR (precursor to the 20D) and she takes great pictures with her zoom. I mentioned this to to DH, because he had pooh-poohed the 10D. When he saw her camera with the zoom lens he pointed out to me that she was using a $1500 zoom lens. It makes a difference.

You have to really think about why you want an SLR. Do you like changing lenses? Do you need a shoe mount for an add-on flash? Do you like carrying a camera bag the size of a small carry-on (camera + flash +lenses)? Will you use a variety of lenses (macro, 50mm, short zoom, long zoom) or do just want a camera that can do it all and do it well?

You might decide that you do need an SLR. But I didn't even know the Canon S2 was an option.

Kimberly
juliebelle is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2005, 07:56 PM   #25 (permalink)
jo
sitting at the head of the Amity round table


iTrader: 11 / 100%
 
jo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,381
Good points Kimberly! I specifically got into this to get back into art photography (in other words lens changes and eyepieces ) But if I hadn't I would certainly have considered the S2- nice camera. I would hate arrying this aroung everywhere- it is a carmera meant for specific purpose for me.

The lower end lenses really aren't the same, but they are great starting points for learning slr photography.

~jo
jo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2005, 07:56 PM   #26 (permalink)
herc
Oatmeal goddess

iTrader: 11 / 100%
 
herc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: central AL
Posts: 11,477
a guy that teaches photography was also telling me about these--

http://www.pentaximaging.com/product...i tal_cameras

eta--
i think it was this camera that he was telling me about--- he thought i might enjoy the fact that it had more options that a standard digital. I am trying to find the info he sent me and so far am coming up short.

heather
__________________

Heather , mama to Liam, born 12-19-01, and Simon, born 04-17-05 wife to Mark, married 09-23-97




Click here to view my feedback
Click here to view my ISO

Last edited by herc : 11-19-2005 at 08:15 PM.
herc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2005, 08:10 PM   #27 (permalink)
KimberMama
Registered User

iTrader: 1 / 100%
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: In the Land of Golden Warmth, Surrounded by Majestic Mountains, Inspired by Desert and Ocean, Cocooned in Love
Posts: 3,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by sagemama
Good points Kimberly! I specifically got into this to get back into art photography (in other words lens changes and eyepieces ) But if I hadn't I would certainly have considered the S2- nice camera. I would hate arrying this aroung everywhere- it is a carmera meant for specific purpose for me.

The lower end lenses really aren't the same, but they are great starting points for learning slr photography.

~jo
DH has a Canon 20D, a better quality short zoom, an "eh" quality long zoom, and a good quality 50mm. He is looking to buy a really great long zoom for our trip to Hawaii. The camera bag is huge, but it makes him happy.

My friend with the 10D is a professional photographer, hence the expensive lenses.

I have a Nikon Coolpix S1 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...to&v=glanc e). I take some great shots with it, and it is so tiny I carry it in my purse at all times. DH grabs my camera when he mountain bikes.

Kimberly
KimberMama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2005, 10:47 PM   #28 (permalink)
rosemary
Registered User

iTrader: 2 / 100%
 
rosemary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 637
One thing to keep in mind if you are deciding between a digital SLR and non-SLR is the depth of field you can achieve. Lots of artsy shots have super shallow depth of field (meaning only part of the image is in focus and then the rest of it softly falls out of focus.)







Being able to get really shallow depth of field is related to the size of the sensor. Consumer-grade digital cameras have smaller sensors, so even with their lenses wide open they cannot get that look the way an SLR can.
__________________


Rosemary
Mama to Owen and Luke
rosemary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2005, 10:48 PM   #29 (permalink)
rosemary
Registered User

iTrader: 2 / 100%
 
rosemary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 637
P.S. What are you doing that you need a 200 or 300 zoom? That's huge! And you have to have such fast shutter speeds with such a long lens. I am very happy with my 50mm or 28-75. I "zoom with my feet" I guess!

P.P.S. The 50mm f/1.8 from either Canon or Nikon is less than $100 and will give you the sharpest of sharp images!
rosemary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2005, 11:32 PM   #30 (permalink)
juliebelle
taking pictures


iTrader: 32 / 100%
 
juliebelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: athens, georgia
Posts: 27,861
ok..i have the d50 and the canon rebel xt in my possession

man..this is tough...i can't decide

i like the way the d50 feels in my hand a little better....but it seems like the flash on the canon is better....does that make sense? anyone have any insight about that?

Last edited by juliebelle : 11-20-2005 at 12:44 AM.
juliebelle is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Advertisements

Directory Sponsor



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
Amitymama.com (c) 1998-2005