Hello Christy and others,
I don't wish to get into a lengthy debate here about soy and agriculture, etc. I do appreciate your post about the soy industry using small, kind farms for their crops. I am not aware that the organic soy crops are really that much better than the conventional soy crops. Please, tell me the names of these farms of which you speak. I would gladly accept the info, if it is really true.
Monoculture is monoculture. Yes, pesticides are bad and they pollute the environment, make us ill, etc., but there is *so* much more to creating a healthy planet than *not* using pesticides. I believe in *improving* the earth, not just sustaining it. Just tilling the soil is harmful for the earth! Topsoil is continually lost. The size of a farm does not necessarily mean anything. Now before I get carried away, I would like to mention that this is a topic very near and dear to me, as I am a farmer or more of a "homesteader" perhaps. I am extremely interested in the subject of biodiversity in agriculture and the actual improvement of soil fertility and health over generations. Animals are an essential component of that. Raising livestock on pasture rather than feeding grain and soy is an answer and solution to the issue of sustaining and improving the land. Also, having diversity on land is essential. I don't just mean crop rotation either. I will voraciously read any articles and books on the subject and am continually learning more about this.
Okay, also I would *never* recommend anyone eat at McDonald's. I am very confused where that statement of yours came from. Yes, eating at most places, including some healthfood stores supports lots of industries that it probably would be better *not* to support, so I agree with you there.
About soy research, look at the entire body of research. I'm sure there are some studies that may not add up, but you can't ignore all of it. It needs to be considered and carefully, before deciding to include soy as a staple of one's diet. Much research is done on animals. Humans are animals. I don't think that animal research can be discounted in the way you seem to think it can. There are also studies done on humans as well, along with the sheer volume of anecdotal human evidence I come across every week. Also, about the amounts ingested, the results showed substantial damage to many, many different organs and bodily systems from soy consumption. That is frightening! Much research on whether certain substances are toxic or not is done in this way, using condensed amounts. IF there is a question about possible damage from soy consumption, and there is a *huge* question about soy safety, don't you think people should err on the side of caution? Also, I don't know if I fully agree that "many other foods would produce adverse results when ingested in this manner" unless you are talking about foods recently introduced into human diets such as grains, legumes, dairy, etc. Like I mentioned previously with the soy research, when the extent and reach of the damage to so many different organs and systems in a body is taken into account, I don't think it is just about the concentrated amounts being given in the studies. It is about soy having many different, far-reaching, toxic effects.
Okay, now I am about out of time, as my baby is starting to stir. I would like to mention a website that I have found very informative about different diets and scientific, anecdotal and historical evidence to support or disprove them at:
http://www.beyondveg.com.
They also have good information about nutrition with vegan and vegetarian diets and what nutrients and minerals you need to be extra careful about when on these diets.
Also, sweetpeasma, soy *does* have goitrogenic effects. It is good that you feel that you have recovered, but perhaps you are an exception. Hypothyroid individuals are usually made aware that consuming goitreogenic substances is harmful for them, including things like cabbage, broccoli, chard and soy. It is just a fact. I didn't make it up.
Anyway, I don't really enjoy debating that much, especially about touchy subjects such as this one, so I am going to call it quits for now and hope that I haven't upset anyone too terribly much.

After all I believe that many on this board are seekers of truth and would appreciate having different dietary paradigms presented, besides just the "low-fat, high-carb is healthy" information I usually see here.
Thanks for reading if you made it this far.
