I've never done it ,but find it interesting. I know a woman whop sees auras - she is such a sweet, kind, shy woman - if it were anybody else I would have been skeptical - but because of her I believe! She also has pointed things out to myself & others in aura photographs. I still have a hard time with the photography thing (my logical mind getting in the way!) - but I trust her, so I would be very interested in getting it done!
I did it a few years back at a whole life expo I went to. Very interesting. I think it was $10 - can't remember for sure. I would say it was worth it. It seemed pretty accurate and *very* interesting. I see auras on some people sometimes and it is pretty cool. It depends on my own state of receptivity whether or not I see anything. It took me a long time to make the connection between what I see (or think I see ) and what it is.
__________________
Katie ~ Mama to my sweet girls~Dylan(17),Kiah(16), and Anja(7)
My mom and I had it done years (1991?) ago at a whole life expo.
And it was not surprising imo. My mom was like "WoW" but I was like "Yeah? I knew that already"
For $10 it was not a big deal and sort of fun.
I've had many friends over the years who can see auras so it's totally not a big deal to me. kwim?
I've read all the skeptic stuff on it and that is fine and dandy also. I figure we all have to believe in what we want to believe in and this is one of the things that works for me.
It's a photo of you, which is supposed to catch your aura around you. The color of it, the shape, etc.
I've never had it done.
In the spring I see auras of growing masses, like the forest, or a large grouping of bushes, but have never seen a human's aura. It's not something I know if I can learn or not. I don't bother, since I would be afraid that I'd put all this effort into it, then want to help people, then tell them and then but brushed off as a quack. I couldn't take that rejection.
I'd say for 10$ it's worth it, if you have 10$ you can spare. I'm not sure I believe it works, but I'd like to see how it compares to the truth.
Or maybe I ought to bring my ficus in in the springtime while I can see it's aura, (which is rare, because it's not dense enough for me to pick up on it's aura) and see if it matches. THere's an idea.... I wonder what the photographer would think of that.
__________________
Ian
a.k.a. miki frog's papa.
"Mikaela Joan, celair tinu od ada thin, a glawar o tin arad"
Translation:
Mikaela Joan, Brilliant little star of Daddy's evening, and the sunlight of his morning.
Last edited by mikifrogspapa : 02-23-2004 at 10:04 PM.
Okay, now that I'm ready to be labeled as an ignoramus. Tell me more. How does one see an aura - and then how do I know that I don't see an aura or, rather, that I do?
How does the photographer capture something that isn't supposed to be tangible on film? not sure if tangible is the right word or not...
I can only speak for myself about how I see an aura. I saw them for a long time (most of my life really) before I figured out what it was.
If I look very intently at someone/something but without focusing on the details of the person/object (I have seen an aura around trees and other *living* non-human beings) after some time I will begin to see a misty sort of glow around them. It is more intense close to the person and fades as it goes out. Sometimes there is a change of colors, but most often I just see a simple one color. At first I thought it was just my eyes and fatigue that was making the glow happen. It never occured that I could be seeing an aura. It doesn't go away if I blink, rub my eyes, etc. once I have focused on it until I look away at something else. I cannot simply on will see them either. I suppose if I honed my skill I could but I really don't have that much motivation to do so. As it is now, it seems that there are simply some people/beings that I am more receptive to seeing. I don't know if the difference is in me or them...probably a little of both.
I will look around to see if I can find my aura picture and post it if I can. It is really pretty cool.