|
April, you have some outdated information. Catholics used to be discouraged from reading the bible because of misinterpretation. But, times change and Catholics are urged to read the bible for themselves. When we go to our liturgies, we are called to reflect on the message of the readings for that day. What we get out of it may be different from the message of the sermon, but that doesn't make it wrong. I, myself, have been known to e-mail my pastor or deacon following a sermon and readings I have reflected on and come to a different conclusion. But most of the time I get something I had never thought of. In fact, last week we heard two readings about Jesus healing a paralyzed man. Our deacon spoke about spiritual paralysis that can affect every one of us. It was beautiful and interesting, and went straight to my heart. (One of the things I love about my church!)
As far as hostility, I guess I thought that maybe some other posts were a little hostile. If you have a question or wonder why, just ask it. But if you want to tell me that what I am doing is wrong and don't really care about the answer, that's different. It is hard to tell in what tone people ask things on a board like this. Your posts always seem to be genuinely asked out of curiousity - so there are no hard feelings. My feelings were not hurt as much as I was tired of dealing with anti-Catholicism yesterday. (I am a public school teacher and heard a lot about how the new Pope was a Nazi.)
I wonder if poeple confuse the influence of the Pope for Catholic influence. I mean, JPII was an influential guy because of some basic values that most Christians (and non-Christians) share - a desire for violence to end, a desire for all people to have basic, human dignity, a desire for the wealthy to care for the poor and helpless. If we reflected on the Pope's message, rather than the messenger, maybe we could see why he had such great popularity and was so respected.
__________________
|